|
|
Post by Evan De Parker on Sept 16, 2013 17:51:26 GMT -4
...Evidently, I missed the post where it was said that the number needed for a lynch was 6 and not 7.
For obvious reasons, I'd rather not be in the hammer position.
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael Jennings on Sept 16, 2013 18:29:42 GMT -4
Look at me all you like James, but I have nothing to hide. If you have nothing to hide then why are you pushing for "inactives" to be lynched instead of scumhunting? |
|
Jace
Midcarder
Posts: 348
|
Post by Jace on Sept 16, 2013 18:39:33 GMT -4
Everyone not named Sally is really sucking at this right now. 1. (no subject) - Envi 2. Matt Stone 3. Michael Jennings 4. Gordon Fury 6. Pepsi 7. Last King 8. Reaver 9. tony There's at least three scum. Probably four on this list. On this list Stone is Dead. It leaves Envi, Jennings, Fury, Pepsi, King, Reaver and Tony. 2 have stated they were town (Jennings and King) if they are believed then it leaves Envi, fury, Pepsi, Reaver and Tony. I want to believe King because last game he some what was the same way and he flipped town. I guess it's benefit of doubt. So, the 5 people to look at are 1. Envi 2. Pepsi 3. Reaver 4. Fury 5. Tony I believe the scum are in these 5. |
|
|
|
Post by "The Last King" on Sept 16, 2013 19:01:50 GMT -4
Well beside Jace, me, Kash, L1, and Sally, no one else have been posting enough for me to 'scumhunt'. One day or not, we only have those 'inactivates' to go off of.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason Cashe on Sept 16, 2013 19:44:30 GMT -4
Maybe me going to Write ups again is dumb but the write up last time around showed Gator has lied about something. I think that is another reason why myself and maybe Jace too jumped so much towards the two possibly most experienced players in L1 and Sally. But I think moving forward, risking a vote for Pepsi who is inactive is better than letting those Non Actives be mod killed and we lose out on Townies because people can't be active for something they sign up for. Wilson to me is jumpy and a bit direct for someone who JUST got active himself. I agree we should go after something and it's funny going after a Non Active seems to be the choice people are okay with when a gameplan even wrong if that's the case was joked at and shit on by the two most experienced players.
Who for all ANYONE knows is working Scum together. For now..Pepsi is fine but this will either be a slaughtering from experience or a long, drawn out process of eliminating non active scum which gives us an easier game. I just think the write up should mean more to the know of the game and how people take to voting. Otherwise why not just post so and so died and that is all. Why need for a write up if the story part isn't vital to the conversation?
I'm a rookie in this game and just looking at it from an inexperienced angle so take this as me thinking out loud. I have never been known to use elaborate ruses as Sally suggested and she educated me so hard I feel Kindergarden. Haha. I bow to her awesomeness actually! She is simply amazing at her wordplay and how she works.
|
|
|
|
Post by "The Last King" on Sept 16, 2013 19:55:12 GMT -4
I just became active because the beginning of high school has been tormenting. But I'm through that phase.
Either way, we are only benefitting scum with no lynches. While it may not be the MOST ELABORATE SCHEME IN MAFIA HISTORY, it is Atleast SOMETHING.
Also, I agree Kash. The writeups need to reflect night actions and such. I am not going to blame Blade or Speede, but the writeups are making vital information to help the town.
|
|
|
|
Post by "The Last King" on Sept 16, 2013 20:00:05 GMT -4
EBWOP.
Hold on... Scratch that about agreeing with Kash.
Is it me or is it when Fury made his lie detector claim, the writeup said 'that's why you believed my lie.' Right before Gator killed KJE.
|
|
|
|
Post by "The Last King" on Sept 16, 2013 20:03:24 GMT -4
EBWOP... Again.
Sorry for the triple post. By Fury lie detector claim, I mean when he stated he was town in order for the lie detector to review him
|
|
Jace
Midcarder
Posts: 348
|
Post by Jace on Sept 16, 2013 20:11:22 GMT -4
That would be another reason I jumped to Sally being scum. Somebody in the last few phases lied before KJE died
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason Cashe on Sept 16, 2013 20:13:45 GMT -4
Fury as far as I've seen is usually more active in these games. Jennings as well so this game is very different in activity than I've seen the past few. I took write ups as bits of good information when I first tried playing. Seems it should be bigger on importance. Not every night action but bits and pieces to hint or at least give some interpretation to whats happened and be able to take from it and put detective skills together to play the game. I believe you on the high school thing, so that is enough for me for now to not suspect you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael Jennings on Sept 16, 2013 20:23:06 GMT -4
Well beside Jace, me, Kash, L1, and Sally, no one else have been posting enough for me to 'scumhunt'. One day or not, we only have those 'inactivates' to go off of. Please tell me this post is a joke. There's been people regularly posting since day one... |
|
Pepsi
Semi-Main Eventer
Posts: 605
|
Post by Pepsi on Sept 16, 2013 20:24:13 GMT -4
Ahhhhh...
I'm here please don't lynch me. My inactivity is because I have been having to post off my phone. I didn't expect to be a target this soon. I suppose it's fair to lynch me based off of my lack of activity, but the lynch would be a mistake.
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael Jennings on Sept 16, 2013 20:25:43 GMT -4
Fury as far as I've seen is usually more active in these games. Jennings as well so this game is very different in activity than I've seen the past few. I took write ups as bits of good information when I first tried playing. Seems it should be bigger on importance. Not every night action but bits and pieces to hint or at least give some interpretation to whats happened and be able to take from it and put detective skills together to play the game. I believe you on the high school thing, so that is enough for me for now to not suspect you. Just because someone isn't posting 50 times in a day phase doesn't mean their activity level has decreased. Just don't have any decent info thus far. I will say that I completely disagree with this "lynch inactives" nonsense because they will be modkilled for being inactive anyway. I think scum is hiding amongst both the actives and inactives which is what we should be looking at not just one or the other. |
|
|
|
Post by "The Last King" on Sept 16, 2013 20:30:52 GMT -4
Well beside Jace, me, Kash, L1, and Sally, no one else have been posting enough for me to 'scumhunt'. One day or not, we only have those 'inactivates' to go off of. Please tell me this post is a joke. There's been people regularly posting since day one... Now everyone wants to post when their name appears in the pot. |
|
|
|
Post by "The Last King" on Sept 16, 2013 20:46:57 GMT -4
EBWOP
Fury was online 14 hours ago, when the writeup was posted yesterday at 4.
Reaver is online, but he is probably looking through the stuff, as he has missed plenty.
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael Jennings on Sept 16, 2013 21:17:56 GMT -4
Please tell me this post is a joke. There's been people regularly posting since day one... Now everyone wants to post when their name appears in the pot. More like in response to your dribble about INACTIVITY when the players posted LESS THAN A DAY AGO which kills any sort of credibility you have for not double checking instead of talking out of your ass to try and get the focus on inactives instead of scum hunting which is where we're at now. |
|
|
|
Post by "The Last King" on Sept 16, 2013 21:30:35 GMT -4
Now everyone wants to post when their name appears in the pot. More like in response to your dribble about INACTIVITY when the players posted LESS THAN A DAY AGO which kills any sort of credibility you have for not double checking instead of talking out of your ass to try and get the focus on inactives instead of scum hunting which is where we're at now. OKAY James. I keep forgetting how you are the more experienced Mafia player. Allow me to step aside and let you preform your scum hunting magic. I'm not gonna argue with you, cause I know my place. But yeah, work your shit man. |
|
|
|
Post by Michael Jennings on Sept 16, 2013 22:28:59 GMT -4
More like in response to your dribble about INACTIVITY when the players posted LESS THAN A DAY AGO which kills any sort of credibility you have for not double checking instead of talking out of your ass to try and get the focus on inactives instead of scum hunting which is where we're at now. OKAY James. I keep forgetting how you are the more experienced Mafia player. Allow me to step aside and let you preform your scum hunting magic. I'm not gonna argue with you, cause I know my place. But yeah, work your shit man. I am scum hunting. I'm looking directly at you for your "let's go hunt inactives" scum hunting technique that is leading us nowhere and I think is leading everyone astray. Speaking of that, I'm putting my money where my mouth is. Vote: Last KingBecause at this point I'm waiting for us to go after people who "haven't checked in" given the direction this game is going in. |
|
|
|
Post by Jason Cashe on Sept 16, 2013 22:53:44 GMT -4
I know a few people who are usully always on point with mafia haven't until today posted much of anything since before the second write up. I know those same people have been logged in and not said a peep until their name makes it on a list. That has been reason enough before to cast a vote. I know with people having outed themselves (me included) scum if active are scrambling to try and go on a killing spree, that has to be the case. What info does anyone have to go in any direction? Nobody has done shit to give a real direction. Other than the apparent false gameplan Jace had going. People have slacked hard and some of them are experienced players. It needs to go somewhere..
|
|
|
|
Post by "The Last King" on Sept 16, 2013 22:53:48 GMT -4
A no. He placed a vote on me.
Lynch me if you want, it will only put is in a deeper hole. I'm pretty sure I just said I'm not argue, yet you continue to push. But don't worry, Mafia expert JamesV has this all under control. I am obviously the bad guy here. It's Okay.
But on a serious note.
James, you voting me isn't good for the town. Like I said, it may not be a strategy that an expertise like you would use, but with everyone lurking the whole day, what else can we go on?
Kash outed his role
Jace outed his role
L1 has a chance at being the town doctor.
That would leave me and Sally;using earlier list; I'm just gonna out cause Mafia will get me anyhow
I'm vanilla townie. Woo hoo
But mark my words, I still think Fury could be Gator. Maybe I'm reading too into it.
Also, Reaver was online like an hour ago and didn't bother to post. But whatever, I'm gonna prepare for school tomorrow.
Good night.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason Cashe on Sept 16, 2013 22:58:52 GMT -4
Yeah Reaver not posting is super suspicious. When does he not have something to say, usually putting himself in a hole in the process? Not to mention Jennings, last game you voted on me off a whim and word of someone not having proof but now you don't want to vote someone because they're not here to defend themselves? Kind of off. Not accusing you just saying you've done it in the past like King is wanting to do now.
|
|
|
|
Post by "The Last King" on Sept 16, 2013 23:05:07 GMT -4
And I was never suspicious of JamesV. If anything, it is Fury that is getting to me.
He said "If there is a lie detector, I am town"
The following night the writeup says "Maybe that was why you believed my lie."
And boom, lie detector is dead. Maybe it was pure luck or a bad frame job to try and male Sally look suspicious. But Fury has me suspicious.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason Cashe on Sept 16, 2013 23:15:34 GMT -4
That is is suspicious. I agree but others might argue it. Someone lied, that is clear from the write up. I think even worthy of an FOS and maybe give Fury a chance to reply to those claims. He's been on the forums and hasnt been involved much at all since before the write up if at all. If he doesnt comment by tomorrow with something vital I would even put a vote towards him. So...
Unvote: Pepsi
FOS: Fury
fair?
|
|
|
|
Post by "The Last King" on Sept 16, 2013 23:24:52 GMT -4
Seems pretty fair.
unvote: Pepsi
FoS: Fury
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael Jennings on Sept 16, 2013 23:50:26 GMT -4
That is is suspicious. I agree but others might argue it. Someone lied, that is clear from the write up. I think even worthy of an FOS and maybe give Fury a chance to reply to those claims. He's been on the forums and hasnt been involved much at all since before the write up if at all. If he doesnt comment by tomorrow with something vital I would even put a vote towards him. So... Unvote: PepsiFOS: Furyfair? Seems pretty fair. unvote: Pepsi
FoS: Fury
Vote: FuryNow we're getting somewhere. I'm willing to up my FOS to a vote because I think King is telling the truth with his claim. If anyone would be lying it'd likely be Fury. Going by what's been said this is the most logical way to vote. King and I arguing isn't going to help matters either. Let's get on the same page and make a logical lynch instead of a shot in the dark. |
|
|
|
Post by Jason Cashe on Sept 16, 2013 23:58:26 GMT -4
Because I fucked off earlier on with Ms. Sally and L1 I'd like to hear from them both on this matter as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by SalTal on Sept 17, 2013 0:35:30 GMT -4
This is far better scum hunting. We have an actual lead to go on. Better yet is a fact that this Lynch satisfies everyone's game plan now. Fury has been quiet and in active. There is something in the write-up for those dedicated followers of it.
Vote: Fury
|
|
|
|
Post by SalTal on Sept 17, 2013 0:47:22 GMT -4
EBWOP
I'll fix that:
Unvote
Vote: Fury
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason Cashe on Sept 17, 2013 0:49:44 GMT -4
Vote: Fury
|
|
Jace
Midcarder
Posts: 348
|
Post by Jace on Sept 17, 2013 1:26:16 GMT -4
UnVote: Pepsi
Vote: Fury
|
|
