|
|
Post by A.C. Smith on Jan 11, 2014 19:33:31 GMT -4
EBWOP
Additionally, it takes FOUR votes for the party in question to role-claim. I'll make sure that's noted clearly from here on out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Jan 11, 2014 19:42:25 GMT -4
who said i have a nite action? and this is wat it comes out to? name calling and cursing? ya u dont seem suspicious at all....
|
|
Reya Serra
Ring Crew
"The Herald of Holiness" Reya Serra
Posts: 41 
|
Post by Reya Serra on Jan 11, 2014 19:44:32 GMT -4
u keep saying it was me but u have no proof. u said it urself ur 80% rite? u were blocked nite 1 ok fair enuff. so which is it reya? is rebel statler or terry? if statler was blocked nite 1 then its best to assume that was terry. and yes u freaked out. u had 2 votes, not even enuff for half, and u jump down my throat. that to me sounds scummy. at best ur scum, at worst ur ani-town. I don't know for certain which one truly is Statler, but based on what I know (parts of which I can't fully explain due to the rules about character/role claiming) and what has transpired thus far it is possible that it could be either one of them. Here is what we do know: - Statler appears to have been trying to maybe recruit someone on Night 1 and that didn't happen. That leads me to believe Statler was stopped in some fashion. It's possible I could be wrong about this, but that is what I inferred from the Night 1 writeup. - I targeted Rebel Night 1. I've pretty much stated as much by this point and if I haven't I'm stating it now. - T-Marv was roleblocked Night 1. This is by his own admission and without any prompting him about his actions, but it is possible that this did in fact occur. - Rex may have/may have not watched someone that T-Marv tried to target. We have no way of knowing exactly who Rex watched or if he even saw T-Marv at all as he died before we could get that information. His vote could very well have just been something to introduce himself to the game with no incriminating information at all. We don't really know. In short, it could be either of them but I'm not 100% sure which one it is. At this point I'm almost certain just on the info we have that it's one or the other. |
|
Reya Serra
Ring Crew
"The Herald of Holiness" Reya Serra
Posts: 41
|
Post by Reya Serra on Jan 11, 2014 19:50:59 GMT -4
Also, it's likely considering that Waldorf could only do things on even nights that Statler can only act on odd nights. Just thought I'd point that out.
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Jan 11, 2014 19:51:54 GMT -4
I SAY you have a night action Knuckles...
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Jan 11, 2014 19:53:37 GMT -4
And where did I call you a name Knuckles? You're just grasping at straws here.
You know you've been caught.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Jan 11, 2014 19:56:35 GMT -4
i guarantee u im not statler and ur word rite now is in question terry. soft claiming tracker sounds a lil convenient.
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Jan 11, 2014 20:01:11 GMT -4
My word may be in question. However, If I'm lynched, then it'll prove I'm telling the truth and you'll be lynched eventually.
If I'm not, then you'll be lynched and come back red and once again prove that I'm telling the truth.
Granted one is preferable to me cause I know I can be even more helpful to the town, but both eventually accomplish the same thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Jan 11, 2014 20:01:53 GMT -4
dude u been freaking out on me since the vote. reya, who did u check nite 2?
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Jan 11, 2014 20:02:25 GMT -4
Dude, this is sharing my information, not freaking out.
Calm down you're taking this to personally.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Jan 11, 2014 20:03:14 GMT -4
My word may be in question. However, If I'm lynched, then it'll prove I'm telling the truth and you'll be lynched eventually. If I'm not, then you'll be lynched and come back red and once again prove that I'm telling the truth. Granted one is preferable to me cause I know I can be even more helpful to the town, but both eventually accomplish the same thing. and same goes to u when u turn up 3rd party im sure but scum would work just the same. sept it would b me that shows up green |
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Jan 11, 2014 20:07:45 GMT -4
But I won't... See, I'm town. I targeted you night 1...was roleblocked. Targeted you night 2 and got all the proof that I need that you killed Tritch.
I can't wait to read your scum QT and see how you're trying to get out of this one.
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Jan 11, 2014 20:14:49 GMT -4
Either way there is WAY too much passiveness going on in this game and it's only benefiting the scum.
So those of you out there, get in the game!
Either vote Knuckles and then vote me if I'm lying, or Vote me and then lynch Knuckles when my role comes back.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Jan 11, 2014 20:53:10 GMT -4
Either way there is WAY too much passiveness going on in this game and it's only benefiting the scum. So those of you out there, get in the game! Either vote Knuckles and then vote me if I'm lying, or Vote me and then lynch Knuckles when my role comes back. now explain to me WHY i would b anybodies nite 1 target over u? aside from it being u of course. that's highly unlikely since YOU r the decorated mafia player and YOU r the guy most chosen for anything. if i was scum terry, wouldnt u have been my nite 1 target? damn straight ya would. on a side note, was anybody else blocked? |
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Jan 11, 2014 21:00:14 GMT -4
You were my night one target because YOU are a VERY experienced Mafia player, and a good one at that.
And it turned out to be a GREAT move, considering you killed Rex last night.
And you're right, i am a traditional night 1 target... which is why I was roleblocked.
*Hands Knuckles a shovel* Keep digging my friend.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Rebel on Jan 11, 2014 21:21:32 GMT -4
I don't believe TMarv was blocked night one. Don't know why he'd lie about it... but I believe he is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Jan 11, 2014 21:34:32 GMT -4
You were my night one target because YOU are a VERY experienced Mafia player, and a good one at that. And it turned out to be a GREAT move, considering you killed Rex last night. And you're right, i am a traditional night 1 target... which is why I was roleblocked. *Hands Knuckles a shovel* Keep digging my friend. being experienced and being good r 2 different things terry and u no it. i may have experience, im FAR from good and FAR from being on ur level of this game. again, rex voted for u for a reason. he had proof of u being scum or anti town. so instead of letting him speak due to gooches rule breaking mishap, u or ur team iced him and jumped at the first person who had the balls to out u. face it terry, ur bluff has been called and u will flip anti-town one way or another. its MY head that gets the noose regardless so wats the worry? is it cuz i presented logic and u reply with sarcasm? i dunno terry i dunno..... |
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Jan 11, 2014 21:35:41 GMT -4
I bet you 100 dollars on paypal that i am town. Any takers?
This is 100% serious.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Jan 11, 2014 21:37:52 GMT -4
I don't believe TMarv was blocked night one. Don't know why he'd lie about it... but I believe he is. whoa, how true is this? this would mean that terry is lying, how sure r u rebs? |
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Jan 11, 2014 21:38:18 GMT -4
Also, you presented no logic. Your logic was "rex voted for you." and honestly, we have no idea why.
Cause you killed him. So I could be framed. Well played.
So if you wish, go ahead and vote for me, it will prove that I'm town and what my role is and then win me a 100 dollars if you have the balls.
Either way, I'm right, and I'm vindicated in knowing that. By outing my information, I've helped the town one way or another.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Jan 11, 2014 21:41:25 GMT -4
if that were the case terry, by YOUR logic im an experienced player rite? then y would u pull such a noob move? y would i do something that stupid?
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Jan 11, 2014 21:45:41 GMT -4
CAuse it would be perfect. You kill Rex, blame it on me. You have nothing to lose... CEPT you were caught by me. Bad luck.
Also, you haven't taken my bet.
If the problem is that you don't trust I'd pay, then we'll both paypal the money to someone we both trust, they can hold it till the truth is revealed, then paypal the winnings.
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Jan 11, 2014 21:50:13 GMT -4
Another thing to think about.
Tritch was a replacement. Likely cause his replacee was modkilled night one.
Tritch would have taken his place after that and wouldn't have gotten a night action.
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Jan 11, 2014 21:50:48 GMT -4
EBWOP
His replacee would have been modkilled night one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Raab on Jan 11, 2014 22:37:22 GMT -4
Sorry guys. I was doing my RP for Phoenix Wrestling. I used my night action on T-Marv last night, but I didn't roleblock him cos it's not my role to do that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Jan 11, 2014 22:37:42 GMT -4
CAuse it would be perfect. You kill Rex, blame it on me. You have nothing to lose... CEPT you were caught by me. Bad luck. Also, you haven't taken my bet. If the problem is that you don't trust I'd pay, then we'll both paypal the money to someone we both trust, they can hold it till the truth is revealed, then paypal the winnings. just not a gambler, and regardless ur still digging too hard. ur stretching at best and u no uve lost give it up |
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Jan 11, 2014 22:38:20 GMT -4
Sorry guys. I was doing my RP for Phoenix Wrestling. I used my night action on T-Marv last night, but I didn't roleblock him cos it's not my role to do that. interesting, any info? |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Raab on Jan 11, 2014 22:39:59 GMT -4
All I got from the PM was it was successful. Nothing more than that.
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Jan 11, 2014 22:48:33 GMT -4
CAuse it would be perfect. You kill Rex, blame it on me. You have nothing to lose... CEPT you were caught by me. Bad luck. Also, you haven't taken my bet. If the problem is that you don't trust I'd pay, then we'll both paypal the money to someone we both trust, they can hold it till the truth is revealed, then paypal the winnings. just not a gambler, and regardless ur still digging too hard. ur stretching at best and u no uve lost give it up If you KNOW I'm scum... you're not gambling then are you? Cept, being scum yourself, you know I'm not. I haven't lost anything. Fact: I came forward with info Fact: Your case against me is circumstantial at best Fact: I said to go ahead and lynch me to prove that I'm town, something you've not done. You've been caught Knuckles... someone with honor would come out and admit it. I'm just saying.  |
|
Reya Serra
Ring Crew
"The Herald of Holiness" Reya Serra
Posts: 41
|
Post by Reya Serra on Jan 11, 2014 22:49:54 GMT -4
First off...
Unvote
Knuckles, to answer your question I targeted Rebel again on Night 2 in an attempt to be certain of my suspicion of him from Night 1.
I don't think T-Marv's necessarily lying about being blocked. I think there's 2 roleblockers in play.
From my point of view there's 2 ways to go from here.
1. Lynch Knuckles on the basis that T-Marv is telling the truth about Knuckles killing Rex. If T-Marv is telling the truth, then he's town and Knuckles will obviously flip scum. This would also make me more confident in my initial thinking of Rebel being Statler.
2. Lynch T-Marv on the basis that he's lying about being roleblocked. This doesn't tell us really about Knuckles, but T-Marv lying would mean that he's non-town. My thinking on Rebel would depend on just how T-Marv flips. If he flips as Statler, then Rebel's obviously not Statler but if T-Marv flips scum then I'm still inclined to believe that Statler would be Rebel.
With that being said...
Vote: Knuckles
The way I see it, the better lynch of these two options is on Knuckles. T-Marv is the one that has concrete information, information that he has shared without any real pushing for him to do so, while Knuckles is operating on assumptions based mostly on why Rex voted for T-Marv...assumptions which may not even be accurate as we don't know Rex's motivation for voting for T-Marv in the first place. Lynching Knuckles, in my opinion, is the best way of determining whether or not T-Marv is giving accurate information to us. If he is, then he's town and we've gotten rid of a scum member in Knuckles. If he's not, then clearly T-Marv would unquestionably be tomorrow's lynch. I'm willing to believe the outcome will be the former rather than the latter.
|
|
