|
Post by Nathaniel Havok on Oct 27, 2011 1:09:41 GMT -4
I'm with the rest of the pack on this one. If he visited her, and didn't like her role/saw it as a threat, what do you think he would do?
Sorry Kaji, but I have to call this one like I see it.
Vote: Kaji
|
|
|
Post by Kurt on Oct 27, 2011 1:35:31 GMT -4
So, we saw everything that happened last night and Kaji was the only one that visited SalTal and she ended up dead... What explanation do you need Noble? Vote: KajiFoS: NobleYou're right, we saw everything...except now apparently no one is going to explain what they saw or any context. We have night information now, but apparently, no one wants to share the context of it, like you're not doing right now... I'm not against voting for Kaji, because he clearly looks guilty right now, but I'm also not jumping on the quick bandwagon without getting something first. IMO, if this is true, scum are sunk, so they might as well get this day phase over with as soon as possible, sharing as little as can be. That's just my thoughts anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Jennings on Oct 27, 2011 1:42:15 GMT -4
Vote: Kaji
It's pretty obvious who did the killing. This should be a no brainer vote.
|
|
|
Post by Level-Two on Oct 27, 2011 3:05:23 GMT -4
Umm, I'm confused. Why exactly can we all see who did what at night? Isn't that imbalanced for the mafia? This almost seems to easy. However, nobody can deny the basic fact. The only alternative is not lynching Kaji; and we get no answers. We lynch Kaji and we get something no matter what. However, I won't be shocked if this is a curve ball Harvey threw at us.
Vote: Kaji
|
|
|
Post by Level-Two on Oct 27, 2011 3:12:16 GMT -4
EWOP
Furthermore, I just realized the implications of this quote. It's almost hinting at Kaji's innocence in an essence.
However, I'm not switching my vote because my point still stands.
|
|
|
Post by President Jeff on Oct 27, 2011 6:12:11 GMT -4
I'm going to wait and see what Kaji has to say before I vote and see if anyone has any information to share
|
|
|
Post by Arcadia on Oct 27, 2011 8:33:15 GMT -4
If Kaji wants to explain, he can. I'm leaving my vote though.
L1, What are you thinking about that note?
|
|
|
Post by Arcadia on Oct 27, 2011 8:41:27 GMT -4
And what is EWOP?
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Oct 27, 2011 9:46:44 GMT -4
not allowed to edit posts so ewop is just posting another that adds to the first post like posting right after the other.......
that quote makes absolutely no sense. although, ill save my vote for kaji after he explains himself. would be way too easy for him to be scum immediately after the last game from being scum right?
|
|
|
Post by Arcadia on Oct 27, 2011 9:57:47 GMT -4
That's silly. This is a completely different game with a different mod. What does last game have anything to do with the roles? Perhaps Branden is hoping you will think that way. Kind of like how someone said they wouldn't put it past Branden to have made Jeff scum since he always votes for him when he's playing. The point is, he's not playing. This is THIS game, and regardless of the last one, Kaji was the only one who visited our dead townie. Even in real life the last person to see someone alive is always the number one suspect until their name is cleared.
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Oct 27, 2011 10:05:02 GMT -4
ya that was me who said that. keep this in mind, im thinking like harvey. we have to stay logical and not jump to every conclusion. in my opinion, he at LEAST deserves a chance to defend himself. if he doesnt with in a certain time frame, then he will get my vote.
|
|
|
Post by brandenharvey on Oct 27, 2011 12:09:26 GMT -4
Umm, I'm confused. Why exactly can we all see who did what at night? Isn't that imbalanced for the mafia? This almost seems to easy. However, nobody can deny the basic fact. The only alternative is not lynching Kaji; and we get no answers. We lynch Kaji and we get something no matter what. However, I won't be shocked if this is a curve ball Harvey threw at us. Vote: KajiAs of this post, it's a lynch. Due to the lamp turning on his light, everyone saw the eraser kill the fan. The office supplies gathered together and put a red X on the eraser before tossing him in the trash. They ask the lamp to leave his light on again tonight. But he informs them that his light is burned out. DEAD - Kaji Fireson Night begins now. No talking.
Night ends on October 28 at 12:00 PM.
Get those night actions in.
|
|
|
Post by brandenharvey on Oct 28, 2011 20:53:11 GMT -4
Sorry guys. I've been fighting with the Wicked Bitch of the West all day.
The office supplies wake up to find that nobody died last night. They had better hurry to find out who the Pissed Off Supplies Mafia are.
Day begins now. It ends at 9:00 PM on October 31.
With 8 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.
|
|
|
Post by President Jeff on Oct 28, 2011 21:00:00 GMT -4
No one died. So either someone got role blocked or someone didn't send in a night action.
|
|
jc
Low Carder
Posts: 212
|
Post by jc on Oct 28, 2011 21:18:18 GMT -4
Is there a reason we know SalTal was a fan and flipped town, but we got nothing on Kaji?
|
|
|
Post by Arcadia on Oct 28, 2011 22:12:55 GMT -4
Kaji was the eraser. It's in the write up.
|
|
|
Post by Arcadia on Oct 28, 2011 22:13:19 GMT -4
And alright, who has new info?
|
|
|
Post by Level-Two on Oct 28, 2011 22:21:21 GMT -4
And the eraser was mafia. We killed the eraser who's a hitman. This probably meant mafia couldn't kill at night. The one time I was mafia; this is how it worked if the hitman died... but a new hitman should be able to start killing starting next night phase.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Jennings on Oct 28, 2011 22:24:49 GMT -4
Interesting. I'm thinking the kill was blocked and if it wasn't sent in then we need to look at people who haven't been online recently. After what happened the last day phase I don't see them not sending in a nightkill.
|
|
|
Post by Level-Two on Oct 28, 2011 22:35:40 GMT -4
Well first of all, If anyone IS a roleblocker and roleblocked someone last night, YOU NEED TO COME CLEAN. You probably roleblocked whoever did the kill and we can take out another mafia man right now.
Also, I would like to know what Knuckles & Atkins were doing visiting me at night on day one. I'm not looking for any type of role... just your input on where you think I stand in this game because I know you two were doing SOMETHING involving me based on those results... and I am already suspicious of atkins.
And Kurt Noble has big red flag over his name and I think he's who we should be looking at for waving his hands trying to save the dear life of Kaji; while planting seeds that anyone who was voting for him was probably just trying to get him killed before any more information came out. Which in reality, doesn't make any sense.
Logically, you ask yourself... why would noble go against the grain to risk looking guilty for defending his scum buddy who was just about GUARANTEED to get lynched?
Reverse psychology for 300$'s, Bob!
|
|
|
Post by Arcadia on Oct 28, 2011 23:12:25 GMT -4
can you claim to roleblocking? I thought the rules say something about not claiming roles.
|
|
|
Post by Arcadia on Oct 28, 2011 23:26:24 GMT -4
Lester, I actually think that Knuckles looks more suspicious that Noble in this one. Think about this: Noble stated almost immediately that I was jumping the gun on voting for Kaji, and stuck to his opinion but Knuckles defended me by saying that my vote was completely logical, and yet still never threw in a vote for Kaji, stating he wanted to give him a chance to explain. A little too playing both sides of the field for my tastes.
|
|
|
Post by Kurt on Oct 28, 2011 23:50:09 GMT -4
can you claim to roleblocking? I thought the rules say something about not claiming roles. You technically aren't supposed to, but people find all sorts of ways to say what roles they have or their abilities without actually saying it...and to honest, people have roleclaimed before and not gotten modkilled. >_> And L1, I'll bite. You know why I didn't want that lynch to go off as quick as it did? Two reasons. 1. Because I wanted information shared just in case someone got killed and then wasn't able to share the info they got that the lamp had revealed. 2. (and more importantly) Because I wanted Kaji to lie his ass off and try and take someone down with him...who we could then clear as town afterwards. I mean, he could have named a scum to try and clear them, but why draw so much attention to someone he wants to protect? Unfortunately, that didn't happen, as he was lynched so quickly. I guess shame on me for sticking my neck out to try and get a little extra on top of the Kaji lynch. While the night info is certainly valuable, w can't play this game solely off it. We need to catch people lying about the info we now have. Based off the lamp's info, I think I can clear one person in the morning...or at least unveil their ability, which I think will clear them as town. I will in the morning when I'm not so tired!
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Oct 29, 2011 0:07:38 GMT -4
go ahead and lynch me, it wont get us the win but GL with that. as far as L-O is concerned, i have no clue wat i was doing hanging out. i could only assume we were on our way to get some midget hookers or something. heres a question tho, wheres havok?
Ms. Arcadia, to ans ur question:
i just wanted to hear wat Kaji would have to say nothing more. i dont know much about this game and i would rather have more facts. as of right now im leaning toward noble but again i wanna hear wat he has to say in the morning. discuss?
|
|
|
Post by Arcadia on Oct 29, 2011 0:10:21 GMT -4
This is my first time playing too. I'm going off of what I've got.
|
|
jc
Low Carder
Posts: 212
|
Post by jc on Oct 29, 2011 0:34:50 GMT -4
You have something on someone, Arcadia?
|
|
|
Post by Level-Two on Oct 29, 2011 0:42:02 GMT -4
This is not a reasonable explanation.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Jennings on Oct 29, 2011 4:14:08 GMT -4
This is not a reasonable explanation. I agree. The midget hookers thing kind of seemed like a potshot as well in my opinion but that's just me.
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Oct 29, 2011 6:15:08 GMT -4
well hows this for an explanation....
harvey wrote it up so we should ask him wat we were all doing cuz i really dont have a clue. now, reading that over again, i notice it said that the lamp was burned out. could that mean that whoever was the lamp, only had the ability to stop things once? i dunno....
|
|
|
Post by Arcadia on Oct 29, 2011 8:00:44 GMT -4
You have something on someone, Arcadia? I was referring to the night info and the way people have acted and reacted. I don't have an investigative role.
|
|