|
|
Post by Michael Callahan on Mar 7, 2012 17:39:15 GMT -4
I'm sorry I can't be here 24/7. I was in college from 9-5 yesterday and went out in the evening, and again today but this time it's 9PM and I've only just got back. I'm not liking the fact that you're all rallying up against me so soon. People are starting to wagon up against me because I wanted to see a Day One lynch, something unusual and exciting that never happens in these games? Give me a break.
I'm willing to bet there's some scum involvement in this steadily growing lynch mob against me because this is going somewhere rapido just like it did in the rail-up against T-Marv.
Unvote
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Rebel on Mar 7, 2012 18:11:29 GMT -4
I'm sorry I can't be here 24/7. I was in college from 9-5 yesterday and went out in the evening, and again today but this time it's 9PM and I've only just got back. I'm not liking the fact that you're all rallying up against me so soon. People are starting to wagon up against me because I wanted to see a Day One lynch, something unusual and exciting that never happens in these games? Give me a break. I'm willing to bet there's some scum involvement in this steadily growing lynch mob against me because this is going somewhere rapido just like it did in the rail-up against T-Marv. UnvoteThe vote against TMarv was a joke because of something silly that he did. Your votes have come because you have painted yourself as a target by acting scummy and pushing a lynch. I'm glad to make sure you see a day-one lynch. Vote Callahan |
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Mar 7, 2012 18:19:38 GMT -4
I'm sorry I can't be here 24/7. I was in college from 9-5 yesterday and went out in the evening, and again today but this time it's 9PM and I've only just got back. I'm not liking the fact that you're all rallying up against me so soon. People are starting to wagon up against me because I wanted to see a Day One lynch, something unusual and exciting that never happens in these games? Give me a break. I'm willing to bet there's some scum involvement in this steadily growing lynch mob against me because this is going somewhere rapido just like it did in the rail-up against T-Marv. UnvoteRapido? This is nothing like what happened to me! This is happening at a snails pace and will most likely not come to fruition. And people have good reason for these votes. Also...the reason it's not moving as fast as my lynch.... cause SCUM ISN'T DRIVING IT! and nobody's expected you to be in here 24/7.... but you've been on the boards quite regularly as I've monitored without even checking into the game...most likely because you've been told to hush up. |
|
|
|
Post by Blade on Mar 7, 2012 18:31:16 GMT -4
I had a massive post written and forgot to hit send, then I closed my browser. I am awesome. Vote: TmarvI just want to see Tmarv panic and sweat a little for the fun of it ;D Callahan had unvoted by then so jeff's vote put him back up to 3. I really had thought the Joke phase was over, but obviously not. and then Farquhar added this Vote: TmarvTime to role-claim T-Marv? ;-p Really didnt like that post. Way too much claiming, and again.. I perceive this to be out of the joke phase. Ok got my role! Vote: TMarv Bailey voting was merely an activity post saying he was in the game, wouldnt be surprised if it was after Noble had prodded him, but to follow the T-Mar vote? Yeah ok lmfao. I don't know whether to laugh or cry for T-Marv right now. xD I can't miss out on this one. Vote: T-Marv. And then Callahan revoted. Putting Marvin at L-2 within 4 posts. I had deemed joke phase over and for the wagon to gather that much steam really sucked, but again we have no info, and T-marv could very well possibly be scum. Does Callahan deserve to be lynched? Probably. Is he scum? Unlikely |
|
|
|
Post by Michael Callahan on Mar 7, 2012 18:32:52 GMT -4
I've responded to everything that's been pointed at me that I've seen. Otherwise I've been on during college hours to check my PM's. Hardly in a position to post. Nobody has "hushed me up" because I'm not scum. And clearly it's moving slowly because the scum of you that have already voted have known to space out votes and keep quiet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Mar 7, 2012 18:35:22 GMT -4
wat r we up to 5?
Vote: Callahan
make it 6. i usually dont vote on day 1 (aside from the joke) but im convinced that he is unusually inconsistent. im also willing to bet that theres possible 4 scum. no proof but just a fair guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Mar 7, 2012 18:39:12 GMT -4
I think with this many people, 4 scum is a safe bet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blade on Mar 7, 2012 18:41:34 GMT -4
wat r we up to 5? Vote: Callahanmake it 6. i usually dont vote on day 1 (aside from the joke) but im convinced that he is unusually inconsistent. im also willing to bet that theres possible 4 scum. no proof but just a fair guess. it's his 2nd game. You don't really have a great knowledge of his game play to make that assumption. I'm putting my neck out here, but I really don't think he is scum. I anyone who was on the original Marvin BW is scum, I would say it is Farquhar |
|
|
|
Post by Kurt on Mar 7, 2012 18:42:16 GMT -4
Day 1 Vote Count:
Callahan - 5 (Kaji, Tmarv, L1, Rebel, Knuckles)
Bailey – 2 (JamesV, Atken)
JamesV – 1 (Bailey)
Not voting: Sally, Blade, Farquhar, Bacon, Jeff, CJ Gates, Callahan
Day 1 will end at 8 PM on March 7th (2 hours, 18 minutes). With 15 alive, you need 8 votes for a lynch.
Note #1: I have not counted Bacon's vote because it was not bolded.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kaji Fireson on Mar 7, 2012 18:43:21 GMT -4
lmfao. I don't know whether to laugh or cry for T-Marv right now. xD I can't miss out on this one. ((Callahan revoting to make L-2 on T-Marv)) Your move, Callahan. |
|
|
|
Post by Kaji Fireson on Mar 7, 2012 18:44:47 GMT -4
EBWOP: I guess my post has less weight until Bacon bolds his vote...but the point stands.
Also, I agree with the assessment of four scum.
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael Callahan on Mar 7, 2012 18:46:41 GMT -4
lmfao. I don't know whether to laugh or cry for T-Marv right now. xD I can't miss out on this one. ((Callahan revoting to make L-2 on T-Marv)) Your move, Callahan. I've responded to that, Kaji. I said in one of my last two posts that the sheer novelty of a Day One lynch, which from what I've seen of other people playing on this board and on EFK never happens ever was awesome. So for that to happen in my second game would be something I wanted to see. That's why I wanted a T-Marv lynch. Plus, that link he posted was horrific. I feel like I died a little inside at that. I understand what you're trying to say, I get it. But I'm not scum, and my bad decision at wanting to see something different and unusual is leading people (including scum players) to rally up against me. |
|
|
|
Post by Anthony Bailey on Mar 7, 2012 18:55:22 GMT -4
You gotta be defensive when your back's against the wall and you don't even know how it got there in the first place  I missed this gem. How the hell is your back against the wall with ONLY ONE VOTE ON YOU?! It's only day one and you're acting like you have 6 votes on you already. Okay maybe the terminology was a bit too harsh, but who knew one could be considered scum after merely checking in and joining in on the TMarv joke? |
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Mar 7, 2012 18:57:39 GMT -4
wat r we up to 5? Vote: Callahanmake it 6. i usually dont vote on day 1 (aside from the joke) but im convinced that he is unusually inconsistent. im also willing to bet that theres possible 4 scum. no proof but just a fair guess. it's his 2nd game. You don't really have a great knowledge of his game play to make that assumption. I'm putting my neck out here, but I really don't think he is scum. I anyone who was on the original Marvin BW is scum, I would say it is Farquhar I think there's more than one on my bandwagon who was scum. His vote reeked of it and he passed it off with some bit of comedy. His gameplay sucked. And I'll be the first to admit, I'll be happy with a Callahan lynch even if he ISNT scum. His play is anti town...that's all there is to it. |
|
|
|
Post by Michael Callahan on Mar 7, 2012 19:03:09 GMT -4
it's his 2nd game. You don't really have a great knowledge of his game play to make that assumption. I'm putting my neck out here, but I really don't think he is scum. I anyone who was on the original Marvin BW is scum, I would say it is Farquhar I think there's more than one on my bandwagon who was scum. His vote reeked of it and he passed it off with some bit of comedy. His gameplay sucked. And I'll be the first to admit, I'll be happy with a Callahan lynch even if he ISNT scum. His play is anti town...that's all there is to it. Oh thanks a bunch. Nice constructive criticism there. Glad to see you're welcoming of newer players. |
|
|
|
Post by Blade on Mar 7, 2012 19:13:43 GMT -4
I think there's more than one on my bandwagon who was scum. His vote reeked of it and he passed it off with some bit of comedy. His gameplay sucked. And I'll be the first to admit, I'll be happy with a Callahan lynch even if he ISNT scum. His play is anti town...that's all there is to it. A little over the top there. So if he is town and we lynch an important role, you will be over the moon with that? I really see all of this as a joke phase taken too far. |
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Mar 7, 2012 19:23:33 GMT -4
Alright... maybe i went a little overboard there and appologize.
Callahan... it has nothing to do with new players. Your gameplay on this day phase sucked.
Your gameplay the last game was brilliant and I applaud you for that.
But for today it reaks of scum....
Also Blade, if we are about to lose an important role (and with the number of votes reached) isn't it time for him to roleclaim, being this close to lynch? It may make no difference, but maybe it would?
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Mar 7, 2012 19:27:04 GMT -4
Also... It's a fucking game folks. No comments are to be taken personally....I thought we all knew that by now.
I play an aggressive game and will continue to do so.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blade on Mar 7, 2012 19:27:04 GMT -4
Also Blade, if we are about to lose an important role (and with the number of votes reached) isn't it time for him to roleclaim, being this close to lynch? It may make no difference, but maybe it would? Yes and no. Yes if he thinks he has a role that is worthy of saving. No, because there is a distinct possibility that Noble has given Mafia safe claims (I know I did) |
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Mar 7, 2012 19:29:26 GMT -4
Also Blade, if we are about to lose an important role (and with the number of votes reached) isn't it time for him to roleclaim, being this close to lynch? It may make no difference, but maybe it would? Yes and no. Yes if he thinks he has a role that is worthy of saving. No, because there is a distinct possibility that Noble has given Mafia safe claims (I know I did) hmmm... Very interesting. Didn't think about Safe Claims cause I've never used them. |
|
|
|
Post by Jules on Mar 7, 2012 19:31:02 GMT -4
I think there's more than one on my bandwagon who was scum. His vote reeked of it and he passed it off with some bit of comedy. His gameplay sucked. And I'll be the first to admit, I'll be happy with a Callahan lynch even if he ISNT scum. His play is anti town...that's all there is to it. I'm putting my neck out here, but I really don't think he is scum. I anyone who was on the original Marvin BW is scum, I would say it is Farquhar Having read these two posts I thought about whether I should even bother responding, but then I figured if you don't dignify ill-grounded accusations here you're automatically classified as scum. I can't actually believe I have to spell this out, but here goes: 1. T-Marv, I would expect an experienced player on these boards to to be able to separate first-day banter from actual role-fishing. I saw Jeff's joke vote and having reviewed the rules (following Noble's announced update) I noticed that 4 votes entitles a player to make to role-claim, hence my joke vote with a joke jab about role-claiming. It wasn't a serious vote, or attempt to get a bandwagon going, which I tried to play off as a joke vote after the event. The smiley face should make it blatantly obvious I made this vote in jest and the reference to role-claiming was done as a way of teasing T-Marv following his accidental post of presumably some horrific webpage. Additonally, what would I have to gain from actually trying to role-fish on day 1? I may have only played a few games here, but I wouldn't think of myself as the kind of idiot who would blatantly role-fish on day 1 and therefore draw attention to myself (which presumably scum don't want to do). But then accusing people of role-fishing on day 1 seems to be your modus operandi on day 1 (ref: Knuckles on day 1 of last mafia game). Seriously, think about it guys before jumping in with two feet. There is playing aggressively and there is playing stupid. Not the same thing. 2. Blade, so you because you decided the joke phase was over that means the joke phase is over, and anyone who continues it is suspect?. The joke vote thing only became dangerous and a bit daft when the bandwagon was in full flow. That is probably when the joke was over. I understand, mine was the crucial fourth vote blah blah blah, but please read above if it isn't so blatantly obvious what was going on with those first few votes for T-Marv. * It would be easy to point fingers in response, but it would be based on the same kind of fuzzy circumstantial evidence that you have employed above. I think I'll wait instead. |
|
|
|
Post by Kaji Fireson on Mar 7, 2012 19:43:54 GMT -4
Here's where we're at.
We have ninety minutes until deadline.
If Bacon ever comes on and bolds his vote, Callahan is at L-2.
If we're lynching someone today, we're lynching Callahan, or we're sticking our thumbs up our asses and waiting to see who gets offed tonight.
Of the people not voting, Callahan isn't gonna' vote for himself, Blade thinks it's all a joke gone wrong, Bacon can't work bold tags, so two of Sally, Farquhar, Jeff, and Ceej would have to join us on this, because I doubt Atken's gonna' be up in time to contribute before deadline, and JamesV and Bailey are kind of passive aggressively at each other's throats or something. Honestly I still have no idea what Bailey's angle is, but we can worry about him, if he's still with us, tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kaji Fireson on Mar 7, 2012 19:46:30 GMT -4
EBWOP
That took a while to write, so the time is off...and I didn't see Farq post before me.
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Mar 7, 2012 20:04:18 GMT -4
I think there's more than one on my bandwagon who was scum. His vote reeked of it and he passed it off with some bit of comedy. His gameplay sucked. And I'll be the first to admit, I'll be happy with a Callahan lynch even if he ISNT scum. His play is anti town...that's all there is to it. I'm putting my neck out here, but I really don't think he is scum. I anyone who was on the original Marvin BW is scum, I would say it is Farquhar Having read these two posts I thought about whether I should even bother responding, but then I figured if you don't dignify ill-grounded accusations here you're automatically classified as scum. I can't actually believe I have to spell this out, but here goes: 1. T-Marv, I would expect an experienced player on these boards to to be able to separate first-day banter from actual role-fishing. I saw Jeff's joke vote and having reviewed the rules (following Noble's announced update) I noticed that 4 votes entitles a player to make to role-claim, hence my joke vote with a joke jab about role-claiming. It wasn't a serious vote, or attempt to get a bandwagon going, which I tried to play off as a joke vote after the event. The smiley face should make it blatantly obvious I made this vote in jest and the reference to role-claiming was done as a way of teasing T-Marv following his accidental post of presumably some horrific webpage. Additonally, what would I have to gain from actually trying to role-fish on day 1? I may have only played a few games here, but I wouldn't think of myself as the kind of idiot who would blatantly role-fish on day 1 and therefore draw attention to myself (which presumably scum don't want to do). But then accusing people of role-fishing on day 1 seems to be your modus operandi on day 1 (ref: Knuckles on day 1 of last mafia game). Seriously, think about it guys before jumping in with two feet. There is playing aggressively and there is playing stupid. Not the same thing. 2. Blade, so you because you decided the joke phase was over that means the joke phase is over, and anyone who continues it is suspect?. The joke vote thing only became dangerous and a bit daft when the bandwagon was in full flow. That is probably when the joke was over. I understand, mine was the crucial fourth vote blah blah blah, but please read above if it isn't so blatantly obvious what was going on with those first few votes for T-Marv. * It would be easy to point fingers in response, but it would be based on the same kind of fuzzy circumstantial evidence that you have employed above. I think I'll wait instead. It's not stupid play... It's using common sense. Callahan easily is the scummiest player here right now. His bouncing of votes is very suspect. His whole push to get a day one lynch on me with his revote was just rediculious. The fact that you're defending him so heavily Farq is also suspect. Lynching Callahan is a GOOD play. If we don't lynch him, then we're down a townie after tonight...callahan will still be alive and probably fade somewhere under the radar and mafia will be at full strength. If we lynch him and Callahan's not scum...then you can all lynch me tomorrow, I won't even fight back. |
|
|
|
Post by Jules on Mar 7, 2012 20:14:37 GMT -4
Having read these two posts I thought about whether I should even bother responding, but then I figured if you don't dignify ill-grounded accusations here you're automatically classified as scum. I can't actually believe I have to spell this out, but here goes: 1. T-Marv, I would expect an experienced player on these boards to to be able to separate first-day banter from actual role-fishing. I saw Jeff's joke vote and having reviewed the rules (following Noble's announced update) I noticed that 4 votes entitles a player to make to role-claim, hence my joke vote with a joke jab about role-claiming. It wasn't a serious vote, or attempt to get a bandwagon going, which I tried to play off as a joke vote after the event. The smiley face should make it blatantly obvious I made this vote in jest and the reference to role-claiming was done as a way of teasing T-Marv following his accidental post of presumably some horrific webpage. Additonally, what would I have to gain from actually trying to role-fish on day 1? I may have only played a few games here, but I wouldn't think of myself as the kind of idiot who would blatantly role-fish on day 1 and therefore draw attention to myself (which presumably scum don't want to do). But then accusing people of role-fishing on day 1 seems to be your modus operandi on day 1 (ref: Knuckles on day 1 of last mafia game). Seriously, think about it guys before jumping in with two feet. There is playing aggressively and there is playing stupid. Not the same thing. 2. Blade, so you because you decided the joke phase was over that means the joke phase is over, and anyone who continues it is suspect?. The joke vote thing only became dangerous and a bit daft when the bandwagon was in full flow. That is probably when the joke was over. I understand, mine was the crucial fourth vote blah blah blah, but please read above if it isn't so blatantly obvious what was going on with those first few votes for T-Marv. * It would be easy to point fingers in response, but it would be based on the same kind of fuzzy circumstantial evidence that you have employed above. I think I'll wait instead. It's not stupid play... It's using common sense. Callahan easily is the scummiest player here right now. His bouncing of votes is very suspect. His whole push to get a day one lynch on me with his revote was just rediculious. The fact that you're defending him so heavily Farq is also suspect. Lynching Callahan is a GOOD play. If we don't lynch him, then we're down a townie after tonight...callahan will still be alive and probably fade somewhere under the radar and mafia will be at full strength. If we lynch him and Callahan's not scum...then you can all lynch me tomorrow, I won't even fight back. I don't think I even mentioned Callahan's name, or even implied his name, once in my post. Therefore, I can hardly be accused of defending him. |
|
|
|
Post by President Jeff on Mar 7, 2012 20:14:59 GMT -4
Vote Callahan
If you guys think he's Scum, then lets Lynch him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reaver on Mar 7, 2012 20:19:36 GMT -4
just remember jeff, we know ur still cum  |
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Mar 7, 2012 20:20:04 GMT -4
FArq: Since the post you quoted of mine was directed at Callahan... and then you jumped down my shit...it's easy to see why I thought you were defending him.
|
|
|
|
Post by T-Marv on Mar 7, 2012 20:20:31 GMT -4
just remember jeff, we know ur still cum That's an intentional typo. |
|
|
|
Post by Jules on Mar 7, 2012 20:32:12 GMT -4
FArq: Since the post you quoted of mine was directed at Callahan... and then you jumped down my shit...it's easy to see why I thought you were defending him. Fair enough T-Marv, an innocent misunderstanding. I think I misquoted you, or misunderstood your 'shit' as an extension of Blade's thought. |
|
